성견의 다양한 임플란트 주위 골결손부 모델에서 재생술식의 효과에 대한 평가
Evaluation of the regenerative procedures in various defects around implant : Canine model
임현창, 채경준, 정의원, 송시은, 김창성, 이용근, 조규성, 김종관, 최성호,
소속 상세정보
임현창 ( Lim Hyun-Chang ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
채경준 ( Chae Gyung-Joon ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
정의원 ( Jung Ui-Won ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
송시은 ( Song Si-Eun ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
김창성 ( Kim Chang-Sung ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
이용근 ( Lee Yong-Keun ) - 연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실
조규성 ( Cho Kyoo-Sung ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
김종관 ( Kim Chong-Kwan ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
최성호 ( Choi Seong-Ho ) - 연세대학교 치과대학병원 치주과학교실
KMID : 0602720080120010044
Abstract
1. Healing of gap defect is influenced by the size and morphology of the defect. In case of rough surface implants, used on less than 2mm gap defects, excellent bone regeneration was achieved in both non-submerged type and submerged type without any additional regeneration procedures in dog. 2. Gap width as well as gap depth is an important factor at the site of gap defect, and bone regeneration is limited as the gap gets deeper. 3. Implant surface is a key factor in healing. At the gap defective site, rough surface implants were superior in bone regeneration. 4. Space maintenance at the site of dehiscence defect is also an important factor and the bone housing around defective site is another influence. 5. In the cases of deeper or wider gap defect, the amounts of regeneration were more limited than in other cases, when the same healing periods were set. Bigger defects needed longer period for healing. On the basis of above mentioned results, defects, which may occur as a result of implant surgery, can be treated effectively, even if our study results are limited.
키워드
Implant; Regeneration; Gap; Dehiscence; Intrabony defect
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보